390 Quick
Answers 21 April
I
will not have office hours during GREAT Day. Make a plan to
participate and tell us about it on Friday.
Work
on your papers and final topics.
After
GREAT Day, we only have chapter 11. We’re getting
there! Remember how busy we were with
mathematics in the 19th century in Europe? The 20th century
will be like that,
not like the slow US chapter. There is _NOT_ less
mathematics being done in the 19th century. Definitely
not. The US is backwards and trying to catch up, and Jeff
and I are struggling to talk about the mathematics because it's
sophisticated and we don't know what to do. This is
important - there is more mathematics in the 20th century than all
of history before. Do NOT miss this big point.
Today
we will have a special supplement on the history of linear
algebra.
“Why
aren’t we required to learn ___?” Because there is only so
much space for requirements. However, there is and was no
limit on what you _choose_ to do. For those who are
finishing - it was your choice to not do more. For those not
yet finishing - perhaps you will learn from the laments of
others. Look for interesting things to study. There
are plenty of opportunities.
Someone
was surprised at the correlation of dates. As always -
keeping a timeline is _so_ important to see how different stories
fit together. Don’t take this lightly. I have good
news for you regarding this - chapter 11 is worldwide and
chronological. So, get your timelines fixed up now and
you’ll be all set.
Statisticians
often don’t think of themselves as mathematicians. Their
history is rather separate. Probability is a branch of
mathematics, and statistics is on its own, which is why we almost
do nothing with statistics. That being said, there are a
couple of good GREAT Day projects on statistics (it is always a
nice area for 390 projects, since we don’t touch it in class).
Lecture
Reactions
The complex numbers _do_ commute (and it's important that you know
that). Only when we go up to the 4-dimensional quaternions,
they do not commute.
The point of Thomas Jefferson is that he was _not_ a mathematician,
and dismissive of mathematics in general.
If you want to know more about _Alice's Adventures in Wonderland_,
please do open and look at the NYT article.
As
an aside: Bowditch and Adrain did consider what would mean
for a star to be so massive that it captured its own light with
its gravity. While this is related to black holes, it’s not
exactly the same and not understood the way it would be 100 years
later.
Yes, a good part of 10.1 was not USian. That is because the US
is still very thin. There isn't much mathematics in 10.2
either.
Hamilton
took a path of invention to devise quaternions. This is the
way math is invented. You have properties you want, as he
did, and you see what would lead to those properties. He
wanted to create a mathematical model of three dimensions, and
along the way he surprised himself to realise that to do so he
needed four dimensions.
The
fact that quaternions were more extensively studied by humans
before vectors is fascinating. Why did we decide on
vectors? Extend more easily to higher dimensions, no pesky
negative sign, and simpler derivation and introduction (as I'm
sure you would all agree). Quaternions were a big deal when
they were discovered, but they were mostly subsumed by vectors,
largely because of leadership like Gibbs and others. This is
how they led to many modern ideas (vectors including dot products
and cross products, gradient, divergence, curl), but also sound
unfamiliar.
Reading
Reactions
Remember
since we're now at this time in our reading in the US …
Âé¶ą´«Ă˝ÍĹ¶Ó Normal School was founded in 1871. Again, if you
want to know our curriculum, that is what was mostly in my
research.
I think of a parallel between the pope doing division and the
president proving the multicultural right triangle theorem.
Neither would be significant if the person were not
significant.
"What is the significance of a journal? What makes them so
necessary?" They are a way to disseminate mathematics.
Also a way to know that mathematics is reliable - has been
checked. We have seen repeatedly that journals are central
to building mathematics culture and community. Having a
place where work can be shared and read with confidence is the way
that a community learns mathematics together. The remains active.
Interesting question when was first ever PhD in the world?
One answer that is fun "The first PhD (Doctor of Philosophy)
degree was awarded to Al-Kindi (also known as Alkindus) in the 9th
century. Al-Kindi was an Arab philosopher, mathematician, and
scientist who lived from 801 to 873." That may be a
stretch. More reasonable by 1150 in Paris. Definitely
by 18th century. .
Somehow this is difficult for me to track down, but Gibbs may be
the first PhD in mathematics in the US in 1863. And in 1886
Winifred Edgerton Merrill became the first woman to earn a PhD in
mathematics in the US.
Yes,
University of Chicago was and is a big deal. It really
defined US mathematics.
Good point - yes there are mathematics associations around the
world. I don't know much about their history in Europe, but
they are there. I can see the reasonable question about why
don't we discuss them. . There are national and
international meetings. I will talk more about the national
ones today - it's one of our main topics.
Having someone go from being the president of Princeton University
to the US President is … stunning, and … nothing like this has
happened again (in this country; it is common in others).
The rarity of this may be a strong statement of how education is
viewed in this country. If you're interested, compare the
education of the new/current Canadian prime minister.
George
Hill used infinite determinants and periodic differential
equations in his study of the three-body problem in
astronomy. His proof showed that the moon is not potentially
leaving sometime.
Complex
numbers show up in electricity and magnetism because they are the
best way to mathematically model two dimensional phenomena.
I won’t be heading in the physics direction during lecture today.
Definitely
it remains important to keep up-to-date on what’s happening in
Europe. Everyone is trying to do that as best as is
possible. It’s easier to the end of the 19th century than it
was to the beginning. Not as easy as it is today.