Âé¶ą´«Ă˝ÍŶÓ

390 Quick Answers 18 April


GREAT Day is on Wednesday.  Read the program.  Make GREAT Day plans.  Our talks are in session 3D, but only those presenting have obligations to us.  Learn something interesting - doesn't need to be mathematical (or historical).  Tell us about it on Friday.  I will say the same on Monday.

I currently have 3 papers that I have not read (two of those have feedback for talks).  It may be another week for those remaining.  I did also update the actual current average for the drafts I have now read.  That reflects both the recent reactions and the draft.  (Catch:  no one's actual current average reflects today's reactions, so for those of you who skipped today, that will have an impact.)  If you have draft comments back you have a new actual current average.  Please read your paper feedback.  Many need to deeply change their papers to focus on mathematics.  Your draft assignment for 7 April was to write the paper as well as you could without my feedback.  Your assignment for 7 May is to improve the paper based on my feedback.  Therefore, if you do _not_ improve the paper based on my feedback, in my understanding, you have not done the assignment for 7 May (even if you turn in something, e.g. the same paper as before).  So, if you do not improve the paper based on my feedback, you will earn no credit for the final paper assignment. 

Any more final topics?  Here's something to keep in mind for examples on the exam:  starting with really chapter 5, culture and region is something that loosely corresponds to modern countries.  So, Germany and France are different.  You really never get to say "they were from Europe" and have that be enough. 

Lecture Reactions

I regretted not saying this about Abel:  he proved that there exists a quintic polynomial that cannot be factored by radicals.  Curiously this work was so general that he did not exhibit an example.  FYI, more from Galois work, most quintic polynomials, can't be factored by radicals, although certainly not all of them.  (x-1)^5 obviously can.  x^5-10x+ 2 and x^5+2x+2 cannot.  They don't look particularly fancy. 

Yes, manifolds continue into higher dimensions, not just dimension two where they are easier to draw and visualise. 

In the Riemann sphere there is only one point at infinity.  In Calc I, 1/0 = ± infinity, but because there is only one, this is much simplified.  


I think, despite so many contributions, that Riemann worked almost exclusively on the analytic side of mathematics.  I don’t know of contributions on the side of algebra.  Mathematics is getting big.  

I will talk about the history of linear algebra next time as a bonus.  There are a few extra stories like this that I enjoy sticking in when we have time as we near the end.  



Reading Reactions

I'm reminded of this because of Banneker, but I think it's worth pointing out … ancient Egyptians were black.  And our Islamic mathematicians were diverse peoples. 

I do not believe Jefferson's comments to Condorcet about Banneker reveal his true thoughts.  The point is that you are right to be suspicious. 

It’s hard to do mathematics when you’re more concerned with survival.  


Before the revolution education was mostly handled overseas, but one way to be independent is to be self-educating.  

Before the civil war it was common to say “the united states are”.  We don’t think about it much, but “united states” really meant that this was a collection of independent countries like the EU.  This is why we live with such a strange system of government now where senators have so much power, despite us not thinking of this place as 50 countries.  But, yes, the colonies all had their own currency. 

I like the idea of thinking of periodical journals as a precursor of modern online discussions.  It's a way to share problems and work on solutions.  Establishing this consistently in the US was tricky, mostly because people didn't reliably have time to focus on such things.

I hope you studied zero-divisors in algebra (330).  When working mod 6, 2*3=0, so they are zero divisors. 

A nilpotent (zero-power) is something that when raised to some power yields zero.  An idempotent (identity-power) is something that when raised to some power yields itself.  There are nice examples with matrices.